INTRODUCTION TO DEBATES

Psychology Debates

SPECIFICATION:

  • Gender in Psychology: universality and bias. Gender bias includes androcentrism and alpha and beta bias;

  • Culture in Psychology: Cultural bias includes ethnocentrism and cultural relativism.

  • Free will and determinism: hard and soft determinism; biological, environmental and psychic determinism. The scientific emphasis on causal explanations.

  • The nature-nurture debate: the relative importance of heredity and environment in determining behaviour; the interactionist approach.

  • Holism and reductionism: levels of explanation in Psychology. Biological reductionism and environmental (stimulus-response) reductionism.

  • Idiographic and nomothetic approaches to psychological investigation.

  • Ethical implications of research studies and theory, including reference to social sensitivity.

INTRODUCTION:

Psychology is shaped by fundamental debates that influence how human behaviour is studied and understood. One key issue is gender bias, where concepts like androcentrism, alpha bias, and beta bias challenge the universality of psychological theories. Similarly, cultural bias—through ethnocentrism and cultural relativism—raises questions about the generalisability of research across different societies.

Another major debate is free will vs. determinism, examining whether behaviour is a result of biological, environmental, or psychic determinism or if individuals have autonomy in their actions. Linked to this is the nature-nurture debate, which considers the extent to which genetics or environmental influences shape behaviour, often leading to an interactionist approach.

The discussion between holism and reductionism focuses on whether behaviour should be understood as a whole or broken down into biological and environmental explanations. Similarly, the idiographic vs. nomothetic approaches explore whether psychology should focus on individual case studies or general laws of behaviour.

Finally, the ethical implications of psychological research—especially concerning social sensitivity—highlight the responsibility of psychologists to consider the wider impact of their studies. These debates are central to psychological inquiry, shaping both research methodologies and real-world applications

Rebecca Sylvia

I am a Londoner with over 30 years of experience teaching psychology at A-Level, IB, and undergraduate levels. Throughout my career, I’ve taught in more than 40 establishments across the UK and internationally, including Spain, Lithuania, and Cyprus. My teaching has been consistently recognised for its high success rates, and I’ve also worked as a consultant in education, supporting institutions in delivering exceptional psychology programmes.

I’ve written various psychology materials and articles, focusing on making complex concepts accessible to students and educators. In addition to teaching, I’ve published peer-reviewed research in the field of eating disorders.

My career began after earning a degree in Psychology and a master’s in Cognitive Neuroscience. Over the years, I’ve combined my academic foundation with hands-on teaching and leadership roles, including serving as Head of Social Sciences.

Outside of my professional life, I have two children and enjoy a variety of interests, including skiing, hiking, playing backgammon, and podcasting. These pursuits keep me curious, active, and grounded—qualities I bring into my teaching and consultancy work. My personal and professional goals include inspiring curiosity about human behaviour, supporting educators, and helping students achieve their full potential.

https://psychstory.co.uk
Previous
Previous

FREE WILL: DO YOU HAVE IT?

Next
Next

GENDER BIAS